Skip to main content

Transplants And Timing: Passages in the Creation of an Anglo-American Law Of Slavery

  • Location: Hebrew University, Jerusalem, International Conference on Histories of Legal Transplantations
  • Research area: Legal history

Jun 2008, Christopher L. Tomlins

This paper applies the concept of “legal transplant” to the slavery regimes that sprang up in all regions of settlement during the first two centuries of English colonization of mainland America. Using a distinction between “extrastructure” and “intrastructure” we can divide the Anglo-American law of slavery into discourses of explanation/justification and technologies of implementation. The two components were produced from distinct sources. English law possessed few intellectual resources that could be mobilized to justify and explain slavery as an institution. Here instead we find the law of nature and nations uppermost. English law offered many resources, however, for the management, distribution and control of movements of people. Thus, the Anglo-American law of slavery joined within itself two transplanted resources. As colonial settlements turned into slave societies, local innovations increasingly supplemented original transplants, compensating for their deficiencies and limitations. Local innovations in turn became a third species of transplant. Assembly laws moved from colony to colony, creating commonalities within regions of settlement, and also – more interesting – among regions usually thought quite distinct. Together the three species of transplants created densely instrumental slave regimes that enumerated all the ways in which summary mutilations and executions defined the slave’s life on the edge of death.

Site design by Webitects

© 2020 American Bar Foundation (AmericanBarFoundation.org)
750 North Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60611-4403
(312) 988-6500
Contact Us
Media Contacts
Privacy policy
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in ABF publications are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Bar Foundation or the American Bar Association. The AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION, ABF and related seal trademarks as used by the American Bar Foundation are owned by the American Bar Association and used under license.