Skip to main content

"Hybrid Judicial Career Structures: Reputation vs. Legal Tradition"

  • Publication: Journal of Legal Analysis
  • Research area: Legal Profession/Legal Education

Forthcoming, Tom Ginsburg, Journal of Legal Analysis

“Hybrid Judicial Career Structures: Reputation vs. Legal Tradition” (with N. Garoupa), 3 Journal of Legal Analysis 38 (2011)

Scholars have distinguished career from recognition judiciaries, largely arguing that they reflect different legal cultures and traditions. We start by noting that the career/recognition distinction does not correspond perfectly to the civil law/common law distinction, but rather that there are pockets of each institutional structure within regimes that are dominated by the other type. We discuss the causes and implications of this phenomenon, arguing that institutional structure is better explained through a theory of judicial reputation/legitimacy than through a theory of legal origin or tradition. We provide some preliminary empirical support for our account.

Site design by Webitects

© 2019 American Bar Foundation (
750 North Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60611-4403
(312) 988-6500
Contact Us
Media Contacts
Privacy policy
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in ABF publications are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Bar Foundation or the American Bar Association. The AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION, ABF and related seal trademarks as used by the American Bar Foundation are owned by the American Bar Association and used under license.