• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

ABF.

Research Advancing Justice

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • ABF Fellows
  • Donate
  • Research
    • Research
      • Learning and Practicing Law
      • Protecting Rights and Accessing Justice
      • Making and Implementing Law
      • See Recent Research
    • Other Work
      • ABF Newsletter: Researching Law
      • ABF Podcast: Whose Law is it Anyway?
      • Access to Justice Research Initiative
      • Law & Social Inquiry
      • Featured Researcher
  • People
  • Programs
    • Faculty Scholars
    • Postdoctoral Fellowships
    • Doctoral Fellowships
    • Undergraduate Fellowships
  • Giving
    • Impact Funds
      • The Ruth Bader Ginsburg Endowed Fund for Research in Civil Rights and Gender Equality
      • The William C. Hubbard Law & Education Conference Endowment
      • The William H. Neukom Fellows Campaign for a Research Chair in Diversity and Law
    • Donate
      • Leave a Legacy
  • News & Events
  • About
    • Board of Directors
Home > Fellows > Professor Alison M. Siegler, Illinois Fellow, Publishes Article on Federal Bail Reform for The New York Times

Professor Alison M. Siegler, Illinois Fellow, Publishes Article on Federal Bail Reform for The New York Times

March 21, 2021

Alison M. Siegler
Alison M. Siegler, photo courtesy of University of Chicago Law School

Professor Alison M. Siegler, Illinois Fellow and founder and director of the Federal Criminal Justice Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School, has co-authored an article on bail reform and the federal justice system for The New York Times. The op-ed, entitled “How Did the ‘Worst of the Worst’ Become 3 Out of 4?”, argues that new attorney general Judge Merrick Garland has an important opportunity to prioritize federal bail reform and “[disrupt] the culture of detention that pervades the ranks of federal prosecutors”.

Siegler and Harris note that 40 years ago, Congress created the “presumption of detention” as a means of locking up the “worst of the worst” offenders before trial. Today, its use has ballooned far beyond its initial intent and the statute “nearly every person awaiting trial in a federal drug case” is deprived of their right to freedom while awaiting trial. They suggest that Judge Garland enact policies to “limit pretrial jailing to cases where it is genuinely necessary”, among other reforms.

Read the article here.

 

Tags: Fellows, Fellows in the News

  • About
  • People
  • Careers
  • For Media
  • Logos & Colors
  • Annual Report
    • Financial Report
  • ABF Fellows
  • Research
  • Learning and Practicing Law
  • Protecting Rights and Accessing Justice
  • Making and Implementing Law
  • Other Work
  • ABF Newsletter: Researching Law
  • ABF Podcast: Whose Law is it Anyway?
  • Access to Justice Research Initiative
  • Law & Social Inquiry
  • Programs
  • Faculty Scholars
  • Postdoctoral Fellowships
  • Doctoral Fellowships
  • Undergraduate Fellowships
  • Giving
  • Impact Funds
  • Leave a Legacy
  • News & Events

Sign up for ABF News:

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Logo
Research Advancing Justice
  • Contact Us
  • Contact the Fellows
  • For Media
  • Privacy Policy
American Bar Foundation
750 North Lake Shore Drive, Fl. 4, Chicago, IL 60611-4557
© 2025 American Bar Foundation
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in ABF publications are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Bar Foundation or the American Bar Association. The AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION, ABF, and related seal trademarks as used by the American Bar Foundation are owned by the American Bar Association and used under license.