• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

ABF.

Research Advancing Justice

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • ABF Fellows
  • Donate
  • Research
    • Research
      • Learning and Practicing Law
      • Protecting Rights and Accessing Justice
      • Making and Implementing Law
      • See Recent Research
    • Other Work
      • ABF Newsletter: Researching Law
      • ABF Podcast: Whose Law is it Anyway?
      • Access to Justice Research Initiative
      • Law & Social Inquiry
      • Featured Researcher
  • People
  • Programs
    • Faculty Scholars
    • Postdoctoral Fellowships
    • Doctoral Fellowships
    • Undergraduate Fellowships
  • Giving
    • Impact Funds
      • The Ruth Bader Ginsburg Endowed Fund for Research in Civil Rights and Gender Equality
      • The William C. Hubbard Law & Education Conference Endowment
      • The William H. Neukom Fellows Campaign for a Research Chair in Diversity and Law
    • Donate
      • Leave a Legacy
  • News & Events
  • About
    • Board of Directors
Home > Fellows > Professor Susan Bandes, Illinois Fellow, Publishes “The Death Penalty and the Misleading Concept of ‘Closure'”

Professor Susan Bandes, Illinois Fellow, Publishes “The Death Penalty and the Misleading Concept of ‘Closure'”

January 26, 2020

Professor Susan Bandes
Professor Susan Bandes, photo courtesy of DePaul University School of Law

Susan Bandes, Illinois Fellow and Emeritus Centennial Distinguished Professor of Law at DePaul University, has published an article entitled “The Death Penalty and the Misleading Concept of ‘Closure'” for The Crime Report. In the article, Bandes explains that the argument for the importance of providing “closure” to the families of murder victims is unfairly used to justify the death sentence. She argues that this rationale rose to popularity beginning in the 1980’s, and came to prominence as other rationales for capital punishment–such as the “deterrence” rationale and “retributive” rational–lost popularity. Bandes explainst that the argument of “closure” is not supported by solid evidence, and moreover arose as a “creature of popular culture, the media, victims’ advocacy groups, and the legal system”.

Read the article here.

 

Tags: Fellows, Fellows in the News

  • About
  • People
  • Careers
  • For Media
  • Logos & Colors
  • Annual Report
    • Financial Report
  • ABF Fellows
  • Research
  • Learning and Practicing Law
  • Protecting Rights and Accessing Justice
  • Making and Implementing Law
  • Other Work
  • ABF Newsletter: Researching Law
  • ABF Podcast: Whose Law is it Anyway?
  • Access to Justice Research Initiative
  • Law & Social Inquiry
  • Programs
  • Faculty Scholars
  • Postdoctoral Fellowships
  • Doctoral Fellowships
  • Undergraduate Fellowships
  • Giving
  • Impact Funds
  • Leave a Legacy
  • News & Events

Sign up for ABF News:

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Logo
Research Advancing Justice
  • Contact Us
  • Contact the Fellows
  • For Media
  • Privacy Policy
American Bar Foundation
750 North Lake Shore Drive, Fl. 4, Chicago, IL 60611-4557
© 2025 American Bar Foundation
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in ABF publications are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Bar Foundation or the American Bar Association. The AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION, ABF, and related seal trademarks as used by the American Bar Foundation are owned by the American Bar Association and used under license.